> > What can you achieve with fame that you cannot achieve with money alone?
> Reaching a larger audience.
Money alone can do that; all fame does is make it more likely than someone else (or multiple people) substitutes their money so you don't need your own.
But then, money can also buy fame pretty easily, so if fame did allow something directly that money did not directly, money would still be sufficient.
We are currently witnessing this experiemnt play out in the real world. Let's see in how far Bloomberg is able to buy a larger audience for his campaign.
> Reaching a larger audience.
Money alone can do that; all fame does is make it more likely than someone else (or multiple people) substitutes their money so you don't need your own.
But then, money can also buy fame pretty easily, so if fame did allow something directly that money did not directly, money would still be sufficient.