Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Clearly someone thought it was unfair enough to take Apple to court over it.

Workers rights has always been a struggle but this sort of behavior has been trending up over the last 20 years. From the "permatemp" jobs to the new no benefits "gig economy" it's worrying.

I'm and experienced software developer and even I have seen this sort of thing.

I worked for a company out of San Jose. I was hired full-time with benefits and a bonus structure based on performance. But I had to switch to hourly at no pay if I was "on the bench" between projects. Despite a year of solid work, and receiving my performance bonus, true to the agreement when I rolled off a project they stopped paying me. I went 4 months without pay. And when they finally found a new project for me to join I had to take a significant pay cut because the rate for the new client was less.

Passing on risk and consequence to the employee seems to be increasingly common.



> I went 4 months without pay.

Were you still expected to show up anywhere or perform any duties? How was the situation any different to being unemployed?


Traditionally, "on the bench" meant getting paid between engagements.

A similar type of wage abuse in call centers: The wage is $X/hr while on a call or available in the phone queue, and minimum wage at all other times.


Hourly at "No Pay" how exactly does that work.

Presumably now any noncompete(etc) are void as your employer has frustrated they contract




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: