Bitcoin hardly created the perverse incentive; pollution has always been an externalized cost in most parts of the world. We really need a carbon tax (or similar) so that pollution costs aren't externalized.
Unless buyers of the coins were charged based on the carbon footprint of the coins they bought, this would just cause mining to move to places where there was no carbon tax.
Unless copyrighted works couldn't cross borders, copyright infringement would just happen in countries which don't enforce copyright...
The US having worldwide enforcement of IP rules a primary foreign policy goal for the past 50 years has mostly closed that loophole, despite most other countries not having a direct financial incentive to enforce copyrights. The same could be done with worldwide environmental costs.
It would also reduce supply of locations, increasing the amount people would have to pay. Do this enough, and it would no longer be economically feasible.
