It might be "all" that it's doing, but it does it quite well and in a way that is quite believable, which is significantly better than what came before, which makes it almost realistic. That's what you said, but the way you said it felt like it lessened the achievement.
> which is significantly better than what came before
It's a bit better. That's the point I'm making; it's just incremental improvement on existing process. Read the actual paper, eg. under 'Quantitative comparison'.
If you think I'm belittling the effort I'm sorry, that's not my intention; ...but, for example, the other comments talking about using it to generate a full 3d model to display on a looking glass surface, or in VR displays a total lack of understanding of what has been achieved here.
It might be "all" that it's doing, but it does it quite well and in a way that is quite believable, which is significantly better than what came before, which makes it almost realistic. That's what you said, but the way you said it felt like it lessened the achievement.