You're missing the point, and taking everything as an attack on NVidia. It's not an attack on NVidia, or have anything to do with Nvidia versus Khronos. It's clear you've got enough baggage there that I won't go there (not like I was trying to go there in the first place).

But the market hasn't exploded. Most computers have built-in Intel graphics, and most apps can't make use of GPU. NVidia won the battle with AMD, but lost the battle with Intel. GPUs are still for gamers, deep learning applications, bitcoin miners, video editors, and a few other niche applications.

Given that CPUs aren't increasing in speed, and GPGPU is failing to make in-roads, for most workloads, computers are only marginally faster than they were a decade or two ago. If GPGPU made inroads into general computing, we'd still be on a Moore's Law curve, but that hasn't happened.

That's the problem.

Not at all, my complain is the poor service that Khronos keeps doing pushing their half backed supported APIs, expecting that OEMs pick up the tooling part.

What ends up happening is that OEMs, coming traditionally from the EE and embedded mindset almost never provide any tooling worthwhile using.

This is why platform APIs always end up winning the hearts of most developers that aren't into FOSS mindset.

Interesting that you mention Intel, they would rather have you using Open API or ispc, instead of pure Khronos APIs.

And Intel keeps failing at their GPU story anyway.