I don't think I was selectively quoting you. You specifically brought up the part about offensive content and the examples they provide, and you yourself agreed he hit a few of those.

> That's not what they said. That's not what any of them say. Instead, they very clearly state that they will determine what is and what is not allowed by their standards.

This is in confliect with your quoted offensive content.

Sure, they will determine what constitutes the examples of offensive content, but at least in this case you yourself agreed with it, yet you claim you don't?

Again, make the argument when they do something wrong, not when they do something objectively in line with their terms and societal norms.

I might agree with you in principle, but I don't agree with the case put forth.