Your theory is that they make more money destroying products than they would selling to another chain. That’s a pretty extraordinary claim that would require some evidence.
Remember, the capitalist nature that you are deriding means that the farmers want to, you know, make money. Why would they intentionally destroy their product if selling to customers at absolutely any price above $0 was an option?
Remember, the capitalist nature that you are deriding means that the farmers want to, you know, make money. Why would they intentionally destroy their product if selling to customers at absolutely any price above $0 was an option?