Reasonable voices would not be so quick to comdemn. Please try to understand that we are just beginning to discover the non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields, and the science is not looking too good for the wireless industry, which will fight tooth and nail to discredit any findings that would cut into their billions.
The rest of the papers you cite are by the same highly controversial biochemist.
At any rate, the discussion at hand is whether "EMF sensitivity" is a real condition. It patently is not. Anyone with such a condition would easily be able to collect the large monetary rewards that have been made available, and simultaneously immediately lift the social stigma they must feel. The fact that they do not speaks volumes.
Yea, cherry picking, me. Note that the rebuttal does not refute Pall's biomechanical thories, or say that there are no non-thermal effects, but that we need more thorough research, and that this research is not being funded. The precautionary principal (ignored in the USA, it seems), would indicate that we should be cautious and not quick to dismiss.
Thanks for sharing the research! You might like the YouTube channel Scottiestech.info Do you have any other way of connecting? Your profile 'about' is very interesting - it'd be great to talk more about hacking and planting trees. You can reach me at the email in my profile.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323998588_Wi-Fi_is_...
Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305691437_Electroma...
Electromagnetic Fields Act Similarly in Plants as in Animals: Probable Activation of Calcium Channels via Their Voltage Sensor
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283017154_How_to_Ap...
How to Approach the Challenge of Minimizing Non-Thermal Health Effects of Microwave Radiation from Electrical Devices