Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I duno man the 'immunity may not even be long lasting' could be true but bringing that up seems like a weird sort of pseudo assumption too...


No, it's a matter of assessing risk. Why would you risk infecting your entire population with a novel virus that kills on the order of 1% of all infected, when you can do shutdowns and perform slow reopenings to limit spread below 5% of the population until vaccination?

We should be assuming that immunity doens't last long and basing all policies on that assumption until proven otherwise.


I think you're pretty far off from what I was talking.

I wasn't encouraging infecting everyone intentionally.

I was noting the ongoing scale of effort required to protect everyone you keep a large % of the population unexposed.

>We should be assuming that immunity doens't last long and basing all policies on that assumption until proven otherwise.

I don't think that assumption makes sense at all with modern medical science.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: