Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm not gp, but let's take a step back for a sec.

(I've mostly lived in the northeastern US)

I live in a small (~20k population) rural technically-city (but... it's a town) where crime is not much of an issue; my car sits unlocked in my driveway and I seldom lock my house -- when I do, it's almost always when I'm at home (alone) -- it's about a feeling of security, not any real risk of a break-in. I've lived this way in this town for many years and have never experienced a robbery. I think it's pretty low risk, not irresponsible.

I've also lived in a larger city. There, I absolutely locked my doors. And I've traveled to tourist-y locations known for pickpockets, and kept an even closer watch on my belongings.

The internet is two orders of magnitude larger than the world's largest city and policing it is exceptionally difficult, since it spans national borders. There will be crime.

I wish this weren't the case. I much prefer living in a safe place where I don't have to worry about locking my doors when I go out. But when crime is common, it's negligent not to protect against it.




I agree with all that and I also don't want to let the perpetrator off the hook. In your example, doesn't matter if the crime happens in a place where it is uncommon or not, it is still a crime and we shouldn't excuse the perpetrator by suggesting that the victim needed to be taught a lesson.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: