Pro-tip: If you want fairly good OPSEC when going to a protest, get a burner Android phone, put it on airplane mode with WIFI only. Then purchase a couple of Comcast / Xfiniti logins off the web, and use those to connect to "xfiniti-wifi" hotspots. Most cities have them, the speeds are fairly decent too.
In Portland hundreds of demonstrators used the mesh-networking app Bridgefy, and some affinity groups used goTennas which even served streaming movies, music, and documentaries that spoke to the revolutionary tenor.
If you have gapps installed (every stock ROM unless you're in china), you should probably assume google is tracking your location through wifi networks. As such, you should probably install lineageos for additional security.
This is more reason then ever to flash a generic android image.
Google does track your wifi and have amassed a huuuuuge library of SSID name, freq, mac addresses and this is what they use alongside IP geo location for google maps and other services.
It's good and also bad. And if you restrict these things, you "look" like a bot so you have increased friction to accessing information!
The looking like a bot, makes sense I get that and ddos prevention but it goes in a circle, doesn't it?
iPhone is not the answer either, but an iphone w/ no google apps doesn't mean you're free from the ecosystem.
> This is more reason then ever to flash a generic android image.
This doesn't really exist. It's not like a Linux distro, each specific device requires a specific device-tree, a separate image. postmarketOS and others are trying to change this.
> To reduce this privacy risk, iOS 14, iPadOS 14, and watchOS 7 include a feature that periodically changes the MAC address your device uses with each Wi-Fi network. This randomized MAC address is your device's private Wi-Fi address for that network—until the next time it joins with a different address.
Realistically nothing, however if they're using a Stingray to target large swaths of people, you're more likely to avoid getting your phone pinged on WIFI. Not to mention going after specific MAC info from Xfinity takes a long time.
Then again, what would happen to a protestor that actually protested in a non-violent manner? Let's specify in the US as I can only guess it would be much more dangerous to protest in a country without a protected constitutional right to do so. So a US citizen brings their cell phone to a protest, non-violently marches with their signs, sings some songs, yells some, gets dispersed in a violent manner and/or gets arrested. If their cell phone gets pinged in a Stingray sweep, what happens? What's the negative repercussions?
Their name goes in a file and they get added to various lists. Depending on which list you are on (and who else was at the protest) you will be eligible for further scrutiny. (Remember, everyone breaks dozens of laws a day, as none are meant to be enforced 100%.) Depending again on which lists you wind up on, you may find yourself unable to fly, ineligible for pre check, blocked from a government contract, failing an fbi background check, the target of yellow journalism, victim of police harassment, always missing flights due to random checks, or always being greeted by an entourage of your own at points of arrival. Have fun!
This is exactly why I'm 100% against the idea of using the "do not fly" lists to block citizens from firearm purchases.
Imagine being denied your Second Amendment rights because you went to a perfectly legal political protest the previous year and you're now on a list that you can't get off of.
I think the trump government has proven that the executive can do whatever it wants, and you're lucky when governments follow the constitution.
Following examples of different behaviour from the past 20 years:
The US can kidnap you,
Ship you off to Guantanamo,
Torture you,
Assasinate you with a drone based missile
I read an interview with CBP folks where they consider the Portland protestors "enemy combatants" which is the same designation as "civilian killed by drone strike" in the middle east
From a low level, more likely perspective, they might leak your information to white supremacist groups, and then choose not to press charges when they do something bad to you? This is assuming you're black, mind you.
Cops can still come and harass you by coming to your house if they can find you or you filmed something they don't like. One person who filmed apparent police violence in seattle had 5 cops come to his to arrest him for something random about another protest. They may have found him from the account he posted it on. In either case, there will be attempts to find some people who weren't involved in violence.
It would certainly seem as if far and away the easiest and best opsec is to not have your phone on you or at least not turned on. Have people really become so dependent on their phones that the thought of being somewhere without one doesn't even come up as an option? I'd certainly at least turn my phone or a burner phone off before depending on not being compromised.
People are pretty dependent on their cell phones. It's our maps, ways out of places. You can even do bus tickets on them. It's our way to call for help, see if someone is okay. So it's weird not to have my phone on me.
Arrested for "your cell phone said you were at the protest" not so much. Arrested for "you were photographed throwing a molotov wearing a limited edition etsy shirt for which you left a review using the same handle as your instagram account" yeah. HN kinda considers that to be the same thing though.
We're truly living in the panopticon