Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sounds like everyone and their mother is scraping stuff off Genius, not just Google; they went after Google specifically because they knew they couldn't just disappear and they had the financial means to pay for compensation, unlike the thousands of crappy lyrics websites.

That said, it would've been just if Google would pay for access to Genius' particular, well-curated, "source" database of lyrics, especially given that they're basically stealing traffic.



But it sounds like the issue is that Google really wasn't using Genius's data directly. The problem is that Google is sourcing from "The Internet," and everybody and their grandmother is 'stealing' from Genius.

Here's an interesting question: if Genius closed up shop tomorrow, how long would it take Google to become the primary source of song lyrics online (by rebuilding Genius's dataset from general Internet harvesting)?


The same thing came up in the Linked In scraping case. The courts have defended website scraping.

Even if Google scraped it on purpose in order to steal traffic, it would likely be legal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: