Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Either you play optimally OR you (semi)bluff.

You can't have both. If you play optimally you lose. If you only bluff you lose. So you have to find a balance. And when you've found it, the other player will change his style so you're in the dark once again.

And the deception also affects your image (your perceived playing style). So the bets you make affect future hands, and the expected profit from future hands. That's what makes the game interesting.

What you describe is a game where you play against one of N players each hand, and you don't know which one. And every hand you get a different anonymous opponent. So basically you have no prior knowledge about your opponent, and your opponent doesn't know you. That would be a really boring game, and mostly number crunching.




So the bot can probably play optimally better than a human, but optimal play just ends up in a draw (or a loss if there's rake) for both parties.

It sounds like they've finally gotten the bot to where it can exploit human tendencies. If so, that's seriously impressive.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: