Why? It's not the same concept, just vaguely similar to some other thing. But all of the interesting aspects are in the difference, otherwise we wouldn't bother mathematically with the concept in the first place.

Similar != Same

And treating similar things as same is the source of a lot of error and confusion and misinterpretation.

If its just to help a beginner at first with a little bit of understanding, you can just say X is a bit like Y, but also very different in really important ways so forget most of what you assume about X, because Y does not work like X, even though it has relations to it.

Many breakthroughs now require cross-disciplinary collaboration. We're unnecessarily increasing the barrier to entry. Imagine if with programming we did away with simple type names like integer, decimal, character, string and instead called them the Karson Couch, Aisling Mcniel, Elmer Enriquez, Alton Francis, and George Boole?

Of course people could learn them eventually.. but what's the advantage? It's much easier to understand the relationship between an unsigned & signed integer vs. a Karson and an Aisling.

I experienced a form of this firsthand when interning at IBM quite awhile ago. They used unnecessary acronyms for everything and it was amazing how much it slowed down onboarding compared to other tech companies. Even for the regular employees it was crazy how much time was wasted at meetings and e-mail back & forth clarifying needless abbreviations.