Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No, one implies a causality that the other doesn't.



"More serious trialer" is not a fixed attribute or category that you can select for. A person fits this description based solely on their behavior; they become a more serious trialer by the act of putting in their email address. From that point the causality is the same.


Yes - my point was that the narrative of "why" isn't useful. A/B tests tell you what happened. They do not provide insight into why. Yet everyone has a story they tell to fill in the why, and these stories are harmful to making good decisions.


It's not a causality, it's a pre-filter. So, of the people who passed filter A more are likely to pass filter B.

Today's XKCD was basically about this (in the Alt text)

https://m.xkcd.com/2357/


desktop version: https://xkcd.com/2357/




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: