Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's interesting, I think I would broadly characterize a lot of the preening work as administrative type tasks, like writing down a process for something as you say, or making a style guide, or a maintaining a table of something, etc.

And what I have observed happens is that some people (higher ups) assume that this kind of administration is actually "management" or "leadership" and promote people, who themselves think that administration is leadership, etc.

The solution is probably to work somewhere else, but I think the root cause is the bundling of admin or coordination type work with seniority and leadership, where somehow it is assumed that because you're a better administrator that e.g. technical direction should also rest with you.



It was definitely a problem deep within the company culture and due to the failure of management to really understand and recognise engineering talent. Visibility and impact being different things is a problem everywhere, but most other companies I worked for did a better job at least trying to distinguish between the two.

And I don't mind if a company recognises that administrative and organisational tasks are important; if you can really act as a multiplier by making other people more efficient, that is actually valuable. The problem is when you don't try to find out if these things really make people more efficient or are just petty ways for some people to build their little kingdoms.


The conflation of administration and leadership is a really good way to put it. I’m frequently amazed that people who seem to be doing the work of a secretary are actually highly-paid “managers”.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: