Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Well you are correct about the reliability factor. In theory, we could have randomly tested, but for reasons that escape me this was done almost nowhere. Deaths is more reliable.

However, the metric that is actually at least attempting to measure the underlying reality of interest, here, is not deaths, but cases, that's my only point. But I totally concede that in some cases deaths may be the less bad metric for cases, than confirmed cases.




Sweden actually does it. It's PCR tests to track the number and change in ongoing infections in the whole population.

0.9% end of April

0.3% end of May

Zero of the tested were infected end of August

End of September is being published next week

https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/nyheter-och-press/nyhets...


On Tuesday, at the press conference, they said that it was 0 in September as well. The more detailed report is published next week.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: