Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I know Apple will not re-sell devices obtained in a buyback/trade-in deal, but being confronted with the reality of it like this makes me think.

After boiling off the pragmatic trade offs, I'm left being slightly baffled by discounts Apple has decided are still economic with a trade-in. Either the margins are that big that it is worth the points with consumers, or there is actually an equal advantage to the discount in removing a perfectly fine device from the second hand market.

The economics of "platform-providers" are very interesting and quite relevant.



If Apple doesn't resell trade-ins, why do they buy them and where do refurbished iphones come from?


Refurbished look as new, which isn't hte case for trade-ins. Refurbised will typically be new products that were returned within the return window, or may be customers that brough something for repair and were offered a new device to speed up the process.


iPhone 11 Pro Max is estimated to cost $500 [1], but retails at $1100 for the 64GB model [2]. Based on their public numbers [3], the most you can get is $450, so they're still ahead if they offer a trade-in discount and just dispose of the old phone. More importantly, they either get to accelerate a potential sale (if the phone is still working) or they get to compete more aggressively on price with high-end android phones

[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/how-much-does-it-cost-to-m...

[2] https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-iphone/iphone-11-pro

[3] https://www.apple.com/shop/trade-in


This costing is way off, given that iPhone 4 era iphones did cost like 40 bucks.


The aftermarket for electronics is very cheap. They dont want to compete with their own/old products that cost 1/10 the price but for almost the same value.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: