It's prolific. If you read comments you will have seen it.
Question is why only one person has called it ( I can see )
It's not against written HN rules, bots are not allowed in unwritten rules, but is it a bot bot?
What more interesting is it's not a ring ( I assume it's upvoted by normal users)
They will be hard to detect. This bot could just calm down and fly under the radar and use upvoting and downvoting to control naratives. By the hundreds.
Need to get people to read comments, as compared to finding a word in them that confirms groupthink and upvoting.
One of the main reasons I read hacker news is the comments. To me they make this site one of the great wonders of the Internet world. Would you mind linking to a few of them that you regard as non-human generated?
I just ask you don't pass it on since I think what is more important is people on HN think more about comments. (Or call it themselves)
Its history and upward karma are interesting. I think it's clever in that it anthropomorphizes itself to reduce attack. Next step would be to hint at mental illness.
But it's about comment quality. Blackhat, pretend OpenAI intelligence don't matter. Comments need to speak for themselves.
