Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

All of the comments under video say it's not guided but rather stabilized.



Yeah, pesky .gov has a problem with "guided" projectiles. Stabilized systems rather than guided systems keep you out of legal trouble.


That seems to be an urban legend. There are regulations on size and power of model rockets, but not on guidance, at least in the US.[1]

[1] https://www.nar.org/find-a-local-club/section-guidebook/laws...


The regulations are not rocketry/FAA/explosives regulations that the NAR deals with, but rather munitions export regulations. Specifically, guidance systems are munitions and therefore are regulated under ITAR Category IV, which means a US resident cannot export the technology by, for example, putting it in a public GitHub repo.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2016-title22-vol1/xm...


Is this missile guidance system a weapon in the eyes of the law?

The feds haven't busted down my friends door for contributing yet.

https://github.com/MuMech/MechJeb2


> Is this missile guidance system a weapon in the eyes of the law?

Yes, it is.

> The feds haven't busted down my friends door for contributing yet.

That's a video game. There are no restrictions on building guided-missile-shaped pixels. If it were shown that the technology could be deployed in a real missile, it'd be ITAR real quick, and the person (like yourself) who were the one to show that it could be deployed in a real missile could be guilty of providing technical assistance to a foreign agent via a github release and public comment.

Not that I think that's the case, but it's really best to tread lightly around these things. You don't want to find out that a bunch of small-time terrorists bought a hobby rocket, and uploaded a kerbal mod, and downed a jet full of tourists or ignited an oil field.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: