Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can someone ELI5 on the significance.



Path tracing is currently state-of-the-art for making photorealistic CG images because it can generate real reflections, refractions &c. by simulating something very similar to how the physical world works.

A photo (or movie) is, however, taken through a lens that distorts the image (sometimes intentionally; what is and isn't in focus in a composition is important for drawing the viewers attention).

A path tracer can already simulate this by just putting a bunch of pieces of glass shaped like the real lenses of a camera, but this is extremely computationally intensive.

This particular implementation uses a few (already known in the literature) techniques for making it faster: bidirectional tracing, selective oversampling, and thin-lens approximations.

This is an implementation of these techniques for Arnold, which is a renderer implementation used for many feature films[1].

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_(software)


Probably not much - the reality is that rendering depth of field in camera in production CG is a very tough sell. Even if there is no speed penalty, renders are usually so expensive that it isn't even a question of doing it in real time in compositing.



I think the poster meant an ELI5 on what Lentil brings and how it works compared to others in its class, not what ray tracing is in general.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: