> First, I don't get why diversity is given passing mention when there's nothing related specific to diversity or gender politics in the solid idea discussed by the article.
It links to the paper describing how non-promotable work is divided between genders in a mixed setting. This is clearly a diversity problem. If women take the bulk of work that won't get them promoted, you end up with women underrepresented in senior positions. Did you read the article?
It links to the paper describing how non-promotable work is divided between genders in a mixed setting. This is clearly a diversity problem. If women take the bulk of work that won't get them promoted, you end up with women underrepresented in senior positions. Did you read the article?