>But Qira performs these tasks as well.

Qira doesn't seem to have diasm graph, fn call graph, hex editor, decompiler, etc.

>It's more minimal, that's all and it's personal preference.

Totally understand and for that you should have a look at radare (https://radare.org/n/radare2.html)

>You didn't need to downvote this lol. Take a little criticism.

I'm sure I didn't as I'm new to HN and somehow don't see downvote option. This was not a criticism tbh, more like a misunderstanding and it's fine.

Radare2 isn't any more minimal than cutter. Cutter contains all the same components as r2, it just layers a GUI on top of them.

(I find the conflation of minimalness with elaborateness of GUI a bit amusing. Like when people say that xterm is more minimal than gnome-terminal, when in fact the two have similar featuresets and xterm is if anything more bloated.)

Sure, I'll have a look at radare.

Their point is that Qira can't be compared to Cutter because they're different products altogether. Qira isn't "better" per se - it is made for a different use case. It's an apples and oranges comparison.