There are solutions, but they are not overly compelling from a cost perspective (yet)
For a g4dn.8xlarge (32 cpus, 128 gigs of ram) plus one GPU its $1000 a month (or $355 if you're only doing 12 hours a day 5 days a week, no over night renders source: https://calculator.aws/#/createCalculator)
Thats still $4k a year.
seeing as you need a remove viewing solution too, so you need a machine to host the Keyboard Video and Mouse, its still not great.
Where the cloud is useful is if you are hiring someone for a 3 month contract, or you need to render something fast, as 100 hours on one machine costs the same as 1 hour on a 100 machines.
Very interesting! I wouldn‘t have expected such a large difference considering the economies of scale (you probably need to also calculate a small cost for maintenance but that should be minor I guess).
Maybe in the end it also comes down to the ergonomics of working with a remote software. If you would have a very good client I think that could abstract most of the limited latency and bandwidth away. Onboarding the data might be a hinderance but considering it is only done once (and also considering the services like aws snowcone) I think thats also minor. Given the name creative cloud I would expect adobe at some point to do the move and also provide the compute for their products (or rather services by now)
Its interesting, there was a VFX company that was called Atomic Fiction, that worked on Looper, Sully and a few other big budget films. They were entirely cloud based.
in about 2014 it did look like everything was going to the cloud. Upgrading a render farm takes mega bucks($1-4 million for a large company) so converting that to a pay-and-go solution looked interesting financially.
A lot of high end "live" editing/colour correcting is done remotely, because the machines are too noisy to have in the same room. (obviously 10ms lag is trivial compared to 45 plus loss)
I think the thing that stopped the cloud rollout was how revisions are made. A scene in a film typically will be priced based on the number of people hours the company thinks it'll take +x%. However a film _producer_ will demand n number of revisions to change things. Those are normally not charged for.
So if you have your own compute, it only costs you staff and power. _but_ if you are pay and go, it also costs you CPU rental as well.
I think you are right, I suspect that at some point either Amazon, or more likely google are going to start giving away software with CPU time. (something like https://www.zyncrender.com/)
There are solutions, but they are not overly compelling from a cost perspective (yet)
For a g4dn.8xlarge (32 cpus, 128 gigs of ram) plus one GPU its $1000 a month (or $355 if you're only doing 12 hours a day 5 days a week, no over night renders source: https://calculator.aws/#/createCalculator)
Thats still $4k a year.
seeing as you need a remove viewing solution too, so you need a machine to host the Keyboard Video and Mouse, its still not great.
Compared to a hp z640 with 48 threads(E5-2673 V3), 128 gigs of ram plus nvidia 3070 is about $2200 - $2900 (https://www.bargainhardware.co.uk/hp-z840-tower-a-configure-...)
Where the cloud is useful is if you are hiring someone for a 3 month contract, or you need to render something fast, as 100 hours on one machine costs the same as 1 hour on a 100 machines.