It won't because for non-techies it's just a random video without any significance. I tried showing it to my girlfriend twice and she was extremely unimpressed and uninterested.
> It won't because for non-techies it's just a random video without any significance.
What a bizarre thing to say. Surely "non-techies" are able to extract some value from the video.
> I tried showing it to my girlfriend twice and she was extremely unimpressed and uninterested.
Oh, well, if your girlfriend was unimpressed and uninterested, we'll just extrapolate from that and presume the same for everyone else (at least everyone else's girlfriend).
>> It won't because for non-techies it's just a random video without any significance.
> What a bizarre thing to say. Surely "non-techies" are able to extract some value from the video.
Movies and TV have stolen most of that value and wonder by showing fake robots moving like this for years. My thought watching the video was "this looks like CGI", not because I think it is CGI (or the lighting or background or anything), but because the only robots I have seen move that fluidly have been fake computer animated ones. Because I believe it's not CGI, I was amazed, but that takes a little domain knowledge.
I suspect a lot of people already think robots moving this well are fairly normal, and not impressive.
It won't because for non-techies it's just a random video without any significance. I tried showing it to my girlfriend twice and she was extremely unimpressed and uninterested.