> While the judges did not address the substantive question on the legality of the site access, they were skeptical of the original conviction, noting that no circumvention of passwords had occurred and that only publicly accessible information was obtained.
It's a pity it didn't make it to full review on appeal to get a solid ruling on this.
> While the judges did not address the substantive question on the legality of the site access, they were skeptical of the original conviction, noting that no circumvention of passwords had occurred and that only publicly accessible information was obtained.
It's a pity it didn't make it to full review on appeal to get a solid ruling on this.