The author is a theist who wrote a book called Spiritual Science. He might be coming by his opinions here with significant bias that takes a non-materialist viewpoint for granted at some fundamental level.
I agree that Libet's experiment is far from sufficient to conclude the lack of free will. However, a valid criticism of Libet is itself far from sufficient to prove that we do have free will.
I agree that Libet's experiment is far from sufficient to conclude the lack of free will. However, a valid criticism of Libet is itself far from sufficient to prove that we do have free will.