> and in fact they've been drifting further away from that ideal over time.
Can you provide a source where "open hardware" was touted as an ideal for the Raspberry Pi Foundation.
It's a cheap education platform built on Broadcom hardware. I don't think there was ever much chance the Broadcom h/w was going to be open. And that's maybe sad for some people but it won't stop the Foundation achieving its actual goals. Open hardware enthusiasts can vote with their wallet, for all the impact it'll have. It must be one of the best selling novelty products of all time.
> It must be one of the best selling novelty products of all time.
Indeed it is. As I mentioned in my comment, I own three of these novelty products. My post wasn't really intended as a knock of the RPI foundation, despite the fact that it's been read that way.
> Can you provide a source where "open hardware" was touted as an ideal for the Raspberry Pi Foundation.
I never presented it as an ideal for the RPI foundation. It's the ideal for hardware tinkerers, and the fact that RPI isn't really friendly to that market undermines the idea that hardware tinkering is the Pi's niche. That's the overall point of my comment: the Raspberry Pi doesn't really have a niche.
That said, they did brag on their blog back in 2012 that "the BCM2835 used in the Raspberry Pi is the first ARM-based multimedia SoC with fully-functional, vendor-provided (as opposed to partial, reverse engineered) fully open-source drivers, and that Broadcom is the first vendor to open their mobile GPU drivers up in this way." I think it's fair to say that this seemed like more of a priority in the past, and many of the geeky people who initially jumped on the Raspberry train were hoping to see it move more in that direction. (I was one of them: I was spamming the refresh button when the Pi was released to try to get one.)
There's also, I suspect, a bit of frustration from the open source hardware community towards RPI for capitalizing / cannibalizing that market. For example, this Ars article [1] refers to "the open source nature of Raspberry Pi (even the schematics are online!)", which we all know is untrue, of course.
Anyway, I guess I was just airing a few frustrations here. The Raspberry Pi is fun to play with, and the community is great (if you stay far away from the official forums). It's just that it's a bit of a jack of all trades, and isn't really ideal for any of the purposes I'd think to use it for.
That's interesting about the old blog post, I think we forget what a state things were back then that this was such a big deal. I was there refreshing with you but not for hope of open hardware. For me it's a cheap board with fantastic support that can do loads of tasks. Albeit not perfectly and there's quite a price jump to get something better, but that's just a testament to the awesome price point they keep hitting. I'm not convinced open hardware enthusiasts have much to grumble about, the offerings before rpi were poor and the market/community jumped forward tremendously on the back of rpi success.
Can you provide a source where "open hardware" was touted as an ideal for the Raspberry Pi Foundation.
It's a cheap education platform built on Broadcom hardware. I don't think there was ever much chance the Broadcom h/w was going to be open. And that's maybe sad for some people but it won't stop the Foundation achieving its actual goals. Open hardware enthusiasts can vote with their wallet, for all the impact it'll have. It must be one of the best selling novelty products of all time.