Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

On long distances you are talking about receiving single photons. And while we may view it as probabilistic, it will either interact with our equipment or it won't. If it doesn't, communication failed.

But yes, I wondered about that when writing my comment. Certainly photons are more than just "bullets" that are getting more and more sparse. So I got curious and it seems[1] that in context on our detector you can indeed put hard bounds on where the photon may be received. As far as I understand it, based mostly on the abstract, I do not really grasp it.

But ignoring the paper, I think I get your point. If photon has any chance of reaching the target (even lower than virtual particle spawning) and even if you don't know the future of the Universe (other photons hitting detector), you can use some complex encoding so that observing certain (allegedly otherwise unlikely) patterns allows you to say you received some message with some probability (which is what communication always is). If you have synced clocks. Simultaneity is relative though so there's also that.

1. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0903.3712.pdf

PS. I seem snarky today, sorry about that, I'm happy to learn if I'm misunderstanding something.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: