Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The Left keeps referring to things as a “human right” (housing is a human right, healthcare is a human right, etc.). I don’t totally disagree, but they mean that if something is a human right, then the government should provide it to everyone.

The case for government providing healthcare to everyone is much stronger than it providing housing for everyone. Why? Because humans are much better at making decisions about where to live than about their medical treatment. That’s it. Rights are irrelevant.




A government option doesn't mean that it's the only option. No one suggesting the government provide housing is suggesting that it becomes the only provider of housing. One of the primary goals is to ensure a good supply of at cost housing stock that can give renters some security and act as a controlling factor on private rents and house prices.

The UK sold off much of it's public housing stock after the 1980s. The scheme was billed as a way to get poor families onto the property ladder but many of the homes were "resold" the same day to private landlords. The result is that housing is now massively unaffordable except for the highest earners and landlords. Private landlords drive up buying prices to the point that individuals cannot afford the deposit because they can extract the cost of the mortgage + profit in rent, the higher rents then make it more difficult for the individual to save the required deposit and the cycle repeats.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: