I am guessing that at $9.99, prospective customers assume that prior customer purchases don't reflect much due diligence -- that people would buy it for $10 "just to see", and just throw it away if bad. Prospectives might then assume that $20 is enough to get priors to research it, or to think twice before recommending it, and that sales at that price thus do reflect quality.
But prospectives don't know anything about priors purchases, right? Maybe prospectives are assuming that the stuff is selling at that price. After all, the seller knows the market best, right? And there is some truth to that assumption: If it hadn't sold at $20, it wouldn't have been around for long.
If that theory makes sense, it may be that your customers felt that $40 was high enough to suggest the consumer validation they needed. Validation was only one component of their decision, "value" was another, and at 80 they didn't feel the value was there. The theory suggests that if you had cut price below 40, your total sales would have fallen.
I imagine that buyers often treat prices like poker bets, and try to extract information about the underlying hand from the value assigned by the holder.
I am guessing that at $9.99, prospective customers assume that prior customer purchases don't reflect much due diligence -- that people would buy it for $10 "just to see", and just throw it away if bad. Prospectives might then assume that $20 is enough to get priors to research it, or to think twice before recommending it, and that sales at that price thus do reflect quality.
But prospectives don't know anything about priors purchases, right? Maybe prospectives are assuming that the stuff is selling at that price. After all, the seller knows the market best, right? And there is some truth to that assumption: If it hadn't sold at $20, it wouldn't have been around for long.
If that theory makes sense, it may be that your customers felt that $40 was high enough to suggest the consumer validation they needed. Validation was only one component of their decision, "value" was another, and at 80 they didn't feel the value was there. The theory suggests that if you had cut price below 40, your total sales would have fallen.
I imagine that buyers often treat prices like poker bets, and try to extract information about the underlying hand from the value assigned by the holder.