Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1409 is plenty early and less ambiguous, so I've put that in the title instead.


Sorry, but that seem unambiguously inaccurate.

To me that reads like 1409 had an even earlier blossoming, and still holds the record, whereas what's actually reported is this is a new earliest since records began. Granted, it's not much difference between 26th and 27th, (and the peak must surely be at least a little bit subjective?) but if we're disambiguating, why not 'earliest peak since records began, in 812' or similar. At least that's consistent with what's being reported.


OK, changed again!


Thanks. I think that's better.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: