Imagine that you wanted to advocate against deplatforming, specifically by suggesting better ways to accomplish common laudable goals. However, you can’t argue directly against deplatforming, as this instantly labels you a Trump supporter (and might get you deplatformed). So what could you do?
I am not claiming any secret knowledge about what Mozilla was or is thinking, but what they wrote can certainly also be interpreted in this light, as well.
How else could one interpret it? I'm genuinely curious, as I thought they were pretty clear about it (emphasis mine):
> We need solutions that don't start after untold damage has been done.
> Changing these dangerous dynamics requires more than just the temporary silencing or permanent removal of bad actors from social media platforms.
> Additional precise and specific actions must also be taken: