Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> imagine a society where people are actually held accountable for spreading bullshit disinformation, wouldn't that be a net good?

Sure, but who cares? Just doing what is a 'net good' isn't a good enough yard stick for whether you should actually do it.

Imagine a society where the weak or infirm are culled at [or before] birth. Wouldn't that be a net good? (Answer: we already went there. Hitler thought the American idea of Eugenics was such a great idea that he made it a major priority of his government)

> we don't have a hardline free speech movement like the USA

A lot of places have movements where people want more free speech. Just like us. The difference is, we were lucky enough to actually succeed. And it really was luck.

There is this myth that we have always just naturally revered free speech. The reality is that our country has only recently evolved its position. Up until the early 20th century, Americans were regularly convicted for defamation of the government (or speech that wasn't in the government's interests), particularly through and after WWI. Then one Supreme Court justice changed his opinion on free speech, and set the whole country on a course to re-interpret the limits of the First Amendment. We can only legally say "Fuck the USA" during wartime, or even salute a Communist flag (at any time), because that one Justice changed his mind.

If one person changing their mind moved us forward, it could also go the other way. And the same could be true for your country.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: