This is weird. Czech Republic (Czechia) is not in the list of eligible countries but every other of our neighbours is O.o. Including Slovakia and Austria which both are even smaller countries than Czechia by number of Residents. I wonder why this is.
Edit: Judging by the comment of required business email and gmail for example being blocked, I consider this hackathon somehow with their rules arbitrary and can't consider this to be some kind of fairly judged hackathon for those prices.
Why Italy is not on the list? Also this part "Canadian residents must correctly answer a time-limited mathematical skill-testing question, if selected as winner, in order to claim prize" what's up with canadians and math?
Laws in Canada require all sweepstakes and the like to have a challenge aspect and a no purchase necessary aspect to separate them from gambling which is quite regulated.
For example, when McDonald's is doing the Monopoly peel offs you can mail them and ask for some free peel offs, which they send you from a limited supply.
We're gonna have six out of six men on a judging panel in 2021? Grim.
[Edited for downvoters: this is important because of natural biases in human judging, it serves as an automatic warning to women and other genders that they are unlikely to be treated fairly and suggests to them that they shouldn't bother to participate.
If you can't be bothered to find a single woman judge, how are you going to rate projects created and designed by or for women?]
>If you can't be bothered to find a single woman judge, how are you going to rate projects created and designed by women?]
That is some pretty non-transitional thinking!
Why in the world would a man not be able to just a Redis project developed by a woman?
[edited because of your edit: I stand by the above statement even in the face of your very weak argument]
Let me ask you a question. If that panel had been all women, would you be on here talking about how a woman would not be able to judge a Redis project developed by a man?
>If you genuinely believe this: that it makes no difference, why would you choose to have an all-men judging panel?
I didn't choose. Perhaps the people that did, didn't have a lot of, or maybe any, women to choose from? Or perhaps, and I know this is going to piss off a lot of people, but perhaps the best judges they could find just happened to be men?
In any case, my mind, unlike yours apparently, did not immediately jump to malice or the soft bigotry of them "just not knowing" they fucked up due to innate misogyny.
How many men and women work at Redis Labs? Do you know their qualifications? ratio? Expertise matters a lot when it comes to judging some other person's product.
I am pretty sure, if you were selected, no matter how good other products will be, you chose female build product. Is this fair?
I politely want to say shut up, but can't find best words. Because you judge people based on their sex/race, I am pretty sure Redis people didn't even think about sex of judges, they just selected people by their expertise. There might have been other female experts on team, but they weren't considered not because they are female, just because other people had more experience (may be)
No one said women are incompetent, this is how you build your own world view, so you think men think women are incompetent.
Not thinking about the sex of the judges does imply ignoring any possible unconscious bias.
I am not a fan of discrimination, "positive" or otherwise, but I think acknowledging that unconscious biases exist, and that a panel selection process has tried to account for that, is the minimum I'd expect for something like this.
e.g let's say you have 10 senior level men because they were in the company since the beginning and then you have let's say 40-60% women-men ratio in new people - juniors and mid levels
If I were company, then I'd send the best people avalibale to things like that, also some people just may not want to do things like that
I can give you a list of professional women UX experts who would have been delighted to have been asked (before now), and if you can't, then I believe you shouldn't be composing a panel for judging UX - because you don't know or haven't researched the field sufficiently well to even identify any women.
The assumption being made in this thread is that the six men are particular experts in the fields being judged: the best available experts.
From what I can see, the selected judges don't even work in those fields being judged (i.e. there is no reason to confer them this expertise), so the reasoning that the best available experts must have been chosen doesn't make any sense.
Redis isn't UX. The hackathon isn't about "product design" either.
It's a specific technology in a coding environment where 95% seems to be male. I don't know 1 female dba, which is more closely aligned than what Redis does ( I do know multiple in design/UX/Graphics )
Open source even has more males to females than tech in general.
> Redis isn't UX. The hackathon isn't about "product design" either.
Please check the parent link for the "Judging Criteria" section (two of the three strands are Usefulness and UX) and "Project Ideas" section (literally all product designs).
If you're going to pay for a prize competition in product design, when your company doesn't have product design as a core skill, then maybe it would be a good idea to find independent, expert judges of product design from outside of the company?
Sure, that's what I would do. But that part is up to them.
I wonder if side effect of such comments/posts are the actual reason we can't fix diversity/racism issues.
Why person in his/her right mind should look at person's sex/race/religion when judging product?
P.S. I am not against diversity, everyone should have equal opportunity, but people should not be forced to be engineers. This kind of messages are freaking me out recently
It's definitely the fault of my comment that nobody bothered to ask a women to be part of a panel judging products. I totally see how that's possible. (sarcasm)
Have you asked yourself why 90% of nurses are women in Norway with best gender equality programs? Why they are not forcing every other male to become nurse?
Female and male are different in some aspects of their biology, no matter what you say, they are different anyway. This difference tends to affect people choice. And 90% woman in Norway choose to be nurse.
We should strive to have an equal opportunity for everyone (race/gender doesn't matter, just equal opportunity), not push people to become what they don't want
That's unfortunate. But it's worth to note that Redis is one of the few projects to have a woman in the development core team (1 out of 5 total core team contributors: would be great to see more than that, but is already a rarity, unfortunately).
Discussions about biases that purely stem from modern synthetic biases merely created by social movements for the sake of recognition are an interesting topic. Bias-ception maybe?
If you're a man reading this, one of the tools you have at your disposal is to pledge not to be a part of a panel comprised of only men. It can help to prompt organisers to assess their biases. Here's one example of such a pledge you could take (either privately, or publicly):
Edit: Judging by the comment of required business email and gmail for example being blocked, I consider this hackathon somehow with their rules arbitrary and can't consider this to be some kind of fairly judged hackathon for those prices.