Let me turn the question around: to what extent are website owners who do not opt out accomplices with Google in the privacy violations implicit in their creepy surveillance profiling tech?
accomplices invokes images of people “in” on the conspiracy.
In my rough estimation based on nothing, I’d guess most website owners have no idea this is an issue that needs fixing.
Your rhetoric is inflammatory, inaccurate, and does your side of the argument harm by making the whole argument look absurd.
I often think of it as: As a website owner, will partnering with Google - a market leader in the advertisement space have a direct negative impact on me and my stakeholders?
If not, it has been observed that there's very little incentive to communicate that change through.
As much as I'd like to believe that altruism will win in the end, it has been established that ultimately the capacity to gain materialistic advantages can often triumph over individual's judgements.
Let's rephrase that... to what extent are website owners who do not opt accomplices with Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Amazon, etc. Please also note that Firefox enables multiple telemetry features by default, such as safe browsing lists that checks links you visit presumably also tracking your URLs in the process.
