if all it takes to block is adding header `permissions-policy: interest-cohort=()
1. Github has all those bots that suggest security improvements to your code - maybe they should also suggest privacy improvements to your code.
2. Governmental sites should be changed to always require this.
3. How about a plugin that when it gets a site without the header informs user via colored tab or similar solution. I suppose Google would try to remove it from add-ons, but then that would be fuel for the inevitable lawsuits complaining this whole thing was anti-competitive and monopolistic behavior on Google's part.
There are also tools that check your HTTP headers. While securityheaders checks for Permission-Policy being used, I can imagine it will be improved to check for the "interest-cohort" value in the future.
if all it takes to block is adding header `permissions-policy: interest-cohort=()
1. Github has all those bots that suggest security improvements to your code - maybe they should also suggest privacy improvements to your code.
2. Governmental sites should be changed to always require this.
3. How about a plugin that when it gets a site without the header informs user via colored tab or similar solution. I suppose Google would try to remove it from add-ons, but then that would be fuel for the inevitable lawsuits complaining this whole thing was anti-competitive and monopolistic behavior on Google's part.