Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

At one point the Post Office's own barrister had to tell them in no uncertain terms that their attempts to prevent disclosure might amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (a pretty serious crime).

The Post Office might not be bankrupted, but I don't think this is going to go well for many of the people involved in the prosecution. The wheels of justice run slow but grind exceedingly fine etc.



Can you cite that specifically? I'm reading through the judgment but its slow going.


See paras 82 to 90.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: