We might've been talking past each other when you said
> Sadly for some their only purpose at work is to cause division
Your implication is that disruption is taking place over issues of workers' rights or anti-imperialism. It isn't for the most part. Those matters pit the company against its workers.
The brand of hostility covered in the article is worker-on-worker, and often occurs with the implicit blessing of the company itself.
My only intent was to draw a distinction, since the latter situation was disingenuously dubbed "progressive activism."
> Sadly for some their only purpose at work is to cause division
Your implication is that disruption is taking place over issues of workers' rights or anti-imperialism. It isn't for the most part. Those matters pit the company against its workers.
The brand of hostility covered in the article is worker-on-worker, and often occurs with the implicit blessing of the company itself.
My only intent was to draw a distinction, since the latter situation was disingenuously dubbed "progressive activism."