Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What we know is that:

* Cloth masks reduce viral loads by somewhere around 30-70%.

* High-quality masks reduce them by e.g. 70-95% depending on how they're fitted.

* We know risk of infection (and severity) is related to viral load, but we don't quite know how.

* We have a lot of well-documented evidence from Asia about reduced infections when high-quality masks are used consistently (e.g. buses in China, hospitals in Singapore, etc.).

* We know masks significantly reduce R0, but we don't know by how much; error bars are huge, and dependent on a slew of other variables.

The key difference between public health settings and hospital settings is opportunities to be infected. As a doctor, I might have 10 opportunities per day, and if I don't have properly-fitted PPE one of those times, and I'm susceptible, I'll catch COVID19. This means half-measures do very little.

In a public health setting, it's a numbers game:

* Personal: If I have 1 opportunity per 2 weeks to be infected, and I reduce odds by 50%, I'm half as likely to catch COVID personally.

* Public health: If I reduce infection odds by 50%, R0 is cut in half. That's huge. Our exponent is very different.

So cloth masks are definitely worth the $2, but won't stop you from catching COVID if you take other risks. If everyone wore N95 or even surgical or nanofiber masks, COVID would probably be gone pretty quickly.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: