I fetched the article at 11:32 AM EDT (per my browser history) and the title and headline were as posted for me.
In any case, it seems unlikely that the OP would conjure up a title that happened to match what the WSJ later changed their title to match character-for-character, so I'd wager that OP copied from WSJ rather than vice-versa or for them to be entirely independently derived.
In any case, it seems unlikely that the OP would conjure up a title that happened to match what the WSJ later changed their title to match character-for-character, so I'd wager that OP copied from WSJ rather than vice-versa or for them to be entirely independently derived.