Assuming you meant "vulnerable." If so, agree completely. If the company that Facebook overthrew, with hundreds of millions of users, can lose over 90% of its value in a few years, there's no reason Facebook is immune.

Facebook's new motto: It's like fucking fish in a barrel.

"Facebook's new motto: It's like fucking fish in a barrel. "

sounds like directly from Zuck's mouth

Have you ever heard Zuck speak? He doesn't talk like that.

"Have you ever heard Zuck speak? He doesn't talk like that."

Dunno about talking, but he sure does IM like that:

http://boingboing.net/2010/09/14/damning-zuckerberg-i.html

ZUCK: yea so if you ever need info about anyone at harvard

ZUCK: just ask

ZUCK: i have over 4000 emails, pictures, addresses, sns

FRIEND: what!? how'd you manage that one?

ZUCK: people just submitted it

ZUCK: i don't know why

ZUCK: they "trust me"

ZUCK: dumb fucks

...

FRIEND: so have you decided what you are going to do about the websites?

ZUCK: yea i'm going to fuck them

ZUCK: probably in the year

ZUCK: *ear

That was how he IMed in 2004 when he was 20. People change.

of course he is a polite, accurate boy enjoying simple quiet pleasures like cutting throat of a goat or taking the head off a chicken.

I doubt he actually works at Faecbook. I can assure you that is not the sentiment prevalent in the office.

I know a few people at facebook and it is certainly possible he works there (this kind of attitude seems slightly more prevalent amongst newer hires), but I agree it definitely is not the general sentiment around the company nor amongst most of the people making strategic decisions.

Looking at his account history, I get a troll vibe from him.

The problem is of course that people will believe what they want to believe