> we can know that Mona Lisa is illegally transferred to the corrupted official, and know who that is.
You mean if the thieves are kind enough to record the "transaction"? Nice. I can imagine several replies trying to rationalize the scenario you made, but this is just silly, because without much effort I can take them apart just as easily. How can you possibly construct an argument that the blockchain would somehow magically help when the Mona Lisa gets lost - no matter using what scenario?
The pro-blockchain arguments always are soooo strange that I'm not sure what to think I read the enthusiastic comments. There never is a believable causal mechanism that connects those ideas to the blockchain showing how - and that - it helps. I'm feeling a bit lost that there is yet another such discussion, which looks exactly like all the previous ones I read (here, mostly).
Consider that for many of the blockchain enthusiasts a tenfold increase in the crypto currency du jour might enable their early retirement. It seems that this could motivate some mental flexibility around the topic if it helps convince others to jump aboard the blockchain train.
You mean if the thieves are kind enough to record the "transaction"? Nice. I can imagine several replies trying to rationalize the scenario you made, but this is just silly, because without much effort I can take them apart just as easily. How can you possibly construct an argument that the blockchain would somehow magically help when the Mona Lisa gets lost - no matter using what scenario?
The pro-blockchain arguments always are soooo strange that I'm not sure what to think I read the enthusiastic comments. There never is a believable causal mechanism that connects those ideas to the blockchain showing how - and that - it helps. I'm feeling a bit lost that there is yet another such discussion, which looks exactly like all the previous ones I read (here, mostly).
This is sooo bizarre!