Your comment makes it seem like they somehow shifted their opinion from one side to the other. That's not what either articles are about.

The one you link is about "Wuhan-Lab Coronavirus Origin Theory Is Highly Unlikely", that the science is "dubious" but doesn't seem to make any strong claims either way (but I only skimmed the article).

The one in the submission is about how conversations and debates about the "Wuhan-Lab Coronavirus Origin Theory" was silenced because many thought it was so obvious.

While the articles are about the same subject, they touch on the subject in two very different ways and are in no way contradictory.

What you are doing here is trying to add more gasoline on some fire, but that's not super helpful.

This is an example of "anything Trump says I must believe the opposite" logic that has plagued our country for the last 5 years.