You are putting words in my mouth. What I am saying is that scientific method is way of thinking. If you have to compare to religion. They are orthogonal. You can apply scientific method and claims that you believe god exist. Because you can't scientific prove otherwise. But at the same time, you can apply scientific method and claims the reverse, that you don't believe god exist. That's fine, because you also can't prove otherwise. And surprise, you can claim you don't know, which is also perfectly fine. The most important part is you don't always arrive at some certain conclusion, and that's fine.

Because it was not about result. Or rather, it's never about the result. It's about the process, in same vain of procedural justice. It's about finding the provability.

The thing is if you can't move past that you have to make a result. Or the extreme, result is ignoble. That the process of proving the utmost important part. You will never get what scientific method is about. Just like your last paragraph. Sure, there are so many theories. Maybe even someone claimed that that harry porter is real! But why do you have to believe or not to believe if you only care about the process of proving and provability.

It's not about proving that the religious people are wrong(or proving irreligious people are wrong). It's about the fact that, for some people , they truly don't care about the result or take the result itself so far as undetermined (still care about the proving process though) and moved past it.