Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is mild fear mongering - I’m skeptical of Xi myself. But You are projecting the colonial powers’ treatment of the world onto a nation that has never done anything close to what you describe.


>But You are projecting the colonial powers’ treatment of the world onto a nation that has never done anything close to what you describe.

Please read some Chinese history. You'll see the exact same level of brutality, imperialism and aggression shown by the European empires, from Rome to Britain.

Much of central and Western China was only conquered during the last 500 years (basically the same period as European colonialism). They too, experienced forced cultural assimilation and ill treatment. They didn't conquer the globe in the way the Europeans did, but equally they didn't have the naval technology to do so.


Ok… heard of Kublai Khan? Part of the mongol empire circa 1200s preceding the colonial powers existence by a good 500-600 years… That was the Yuan Dynasty (in china) and they conquered a whole lot more than modern day china.

Now since Yuan, you’ve had Ming and Qing… neither of which were particularly aggressive outside of their borders… and Qing was of course the start of the Opium wars, where the colonial powers essentially raped china for all its resources.

With regard to your strange Naval quip. You should look up the Chinese treasure ship. (Ming dynasty)… predates the colonials naval power.

So which Chinese in particular would you like me to read about? Everything you said is factually incorrect. To a laughable degree. I recommend you watch Marco Polo on Netflix, it’d teach you something.


If you're getting your historical education from Netflix, maybe you're not the right person to berate others for theirs.


I don’t. Just suggesting that EVEN Netflix would prove OP points wrong.

I’ve got a major in Chinese History. Maybe get one of those too and come back and we can chat?


Naah, doesn't seem worth it, just for the sake of this discussion. ;-)

Sorry, must have missed the meaning of the "even", so the more charitable reading didn't occur to me.


People are the same. China is very well known for its extreme nationalistic tendencies. The Party to stay in power must be really, really to the right in terms on nationalism. Without nationalism the Party has no chance staying in power. Read up on the topic. And yes, they treat their minorities extremely bad. Including concentration camps for Ughurs. US compared to them is a pure equality heaven.


The US comparison is just not true, you are ignoring the vast majority of US history when you say something like that.

Nationalism is not the same as subjecting your surrounding neighbours, which is the implication that the OP was making.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: