Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Remember the hand washing phase of the pandemic?

Guidelines need to be enumerated, like product releases.

So much angst would be avoided. When there's a disagreement, the parties (operating in good faith) could go meta and compare guideline versions. Which would help resolve differences.

"Oh, you're following guidelines USA-1.4. I see. FYI, last week our governor issued USA-NY-1.5, clarifying protocols for open air retail. All these revisions! Such a bother, I know. I'm so glad you and me are back on the same page. Be safe! We'll get thru this."



Even easier would be simply admitting they were wrong about the previous guidelines and explaining why, you know like grown ups.


They did. Repeatedly.

Further, many exposés and post mortems are in progress.

The Premonition https://www.amazon.com/Premonition-Pandemic-Story-Michael-Le...

Uncontrolled Spread: Why COVID-19 Crushed Us and How We Can Defeat the Next Pandemic https://www.amazon.com/Preparing-Inevitable-Normal-Survive-E...

Preventable https://www.amazon.com/Preventable-Leadership-Failures-Selfi...

Move on.


The problem is that the people admitting these mistakes were not necessarily the political figures advocating them to the populace at large. I imagine a fair bit of opposition to the safe vaccines we are able to enjoy is due to skepticism of political figures not owning up to their initial false statements. For example, I distinctly remember the former president stating loudly and repeatedly that Coronavirus was no big deal (paraphrasing), that it would disappear overnight, that the United States was well prepared for it, and so on. I do not recall any mea culpa's being issue: just one new bold statement after the next.

To be fair to our conservative friends, I'm sure this behavior is not limited to only one political party.


Only after being left with no choice or when politically convenient. Too little too late.


"Stop Flip Flopping"

Politicians have to appeal to people who crave stability above all else, and trying to do otherwise will just get them replaced by someone who knows how to appeal to stability.


I'm not sure that's actually the case here; anecdotally, but a lot of the criticism of the former president at the time came from his bold statements that he never bothered to correct. Though, to be fair, that's probably not the only reason his former supporters did not come out to vote for him in round 2.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: