Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Economic history of World War II and the 18th Brumaire (adamtooze.substack.com)
42 points by who-knows on July 17, 2021 | hide | past | favorite | 11 comments


Hitler relied on risk, rhetoric, and gambling to achieve his modest conquests. Recall, he didn't actually conquer Austria and he used rhetoric to gain Czech lands, which would've offered great resistance in heavily fortified mountain forts. He gambled multiple times and got lucky. If the other Germans, French, Austrians, or Czechs had actually stopped him boldly, he would've received much more bad press long before Poland. This could've given Poland and France time to prepare for the Blitzkrieg, which they sorely were not.

Hitler was increasingly poor as a leader over time. Megalomania, hubris, over confidence, narcissism, he definitively lost the war by invading USSR, a very stupid decision. Stalin's reaction wasn't even rapid, Hitler's enemies dithered and paused, it took Churchill and a delayed awakening by Stalin and that was enough to stop "mighty" Germany. It didn't hurt that the USA provided the material and the bulk of the final push, that was key.


"which would've offered great resistance in heavily fortified mountain forts"

Hopefully we would've offered great resistance, but the belt of fortifications was far from complete and we had Hungary and Poland ready to jump on our throats as well. There is no way that a noodle-shaped country like Czechoslovakia of 1938 was can survive attack from all sides simultaneously, with one of the attackers on very high military level.

From the Allies' point of view, the fact that Hitler gained access to Czech heavy industry was probably worse than anything else. Subjugated Czech factories played a huge role in arming Germany for the coming war.


Already manufactured Czech tanks played a big role in the early years of the war, it wasn't just the capture of the factories that was important.


Remember politics. Poland and neighbors knew of Germany's invasion plans, but were not allowed to mobilize or prepare, so they "wouldn't antagonize the Germans." The British were playing politics hoping that talks would solve everything. So in that sense, you are correct, his rhetoric prevented an appropriate response.


The idea that Germany came even close to winning the war has always seemed aggressively idiotic to me. We weren't lucky to win the war, Germany was lucky to even make it out of the 30's


In May 1940, as the British were evacuating Dunkirk, Churchill met the Cabinet to discuss a possible armistice with Germany, mediated through Mussolini.

At that point, UK was the only significant power fighting the Germans. Churchill prevailed against Halifax, but if the decision went the other way, Germans would have uncontested control over most of the continent either directly or through satellite states, with exception of the USSR and small holdouts like Malta.


They had won the war. Then, they decided to invade the USSR...

Same mistake Napoleon did and it played out almost the same.


But this assumes the US never entered the war. The US was basically invincible before the advent of the ICBM because there was no way for neither Germany nor Japan to launch an effective attack on the US mainland, and more importantly, on its industrial capacity. But the US could easily attack by air both Germany and Japan thanks to allies within striking range. The standard Nazis/Japan conquers the US scenario as in The Man in the High Castle just doesn't make sense.


If Germany had not invaded the USSR then they would both have had the upper hand at an invasion of the British Isles and an allied invasion of Europe would have been close to impossible. At which point whether Germany could successfully invade the US becomes irrelevant because neither side can destroy the other, which usually leads to peace talks and a peace agreement that acknowledges the status quo, which was German control of Europe.

Again, that's not very different from the situation in 1812. In fact Germany had a much stronger position.

Japan also went way over their heads but they actually did that early when they invaded China. The attack on Pearl Harbour was the nail in the coffin because that led to full support from the US to China along with destruction of Japanese industrial capacity.

Don't try to invade Russia, and don't try to invade China. This may sound obvious but history shows that lessons need to be learned and re-learned the hard way.


It wasn’t luck.

After two devastating wars look at where Germany is now. An economic and industrial superpower


The counterfactual is explored in Philip K. Dick's "The Man in the High Castle"




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: