Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> What if GitHub bans you?

This is one of those things that I was talking about them sympathizing with.

It's unrealistic. If you're getting banned from github or a cloud provider maybe you should reconsider what you're doing.

> You're faster, but I have better negotiating power (ie: less costs) by threatening to switch vendors.

Okay, but AWS isn't expensive as it is. If you build to the way these resources are meant to be built you can seriously minimize your costs.

I've seen plenty of lift and shifted apps get their costs dramatically reduced once redesigned in a "cloud native" architecture. The lift and shifted design was in the thousands of dollars a month. Rebuilding for AWS resources brought our costs to almost literally nothing on this same app. I'm talking $5,000 a month to $5 per month.

So I have a hard time following the premise that you'll do it cheaper with an on-prem or self-managed system.



Why is this getting downvoted?


Probably for this line:

> If you're getting banned from github or a cloud provider maybe you should reconsider what you're doing.

That’s a sentiment popular among Big Tech types (such as Eric Schmidt: “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place”), and distinctly unpopular among those who consider the cloud providers’ decisionmaking arbitrary, capricious, or dangerous.


Exactly. I had to migrate a legal canadian gun business website from Shopify to Magento because Shopify changed their policies years ago.

There's still some topics that are taboo and that some businesses refuses to touch.


But you still went with a cloud hosted solution.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: