Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When people talk about comp, they usually talk about the # of $$ they took home last year - anything else is magic money so to speak.

For the same reason a manager isn't going to value a $10MM grant in company that ended up being a penny stock, he isn't going to downgrade a company that resurrected from the pits either. Money in hand last year is the best measure possible/available.



That's not what it looks like on levels.fyi. It's regularly: "SDE 1, 110k + 75k stock options", and then levels.fyi will declare that 185, not 110 + 0, 112 + 38, 115 + 19, 120 + 19

edit: and then people will come on here and say "look! Brand new Google employees make 200k!"


Levels FYI doesn't usually do that.

Looking at how they handle Google, for example they show base|annual stock|signing bonus.

So when you see 130K base + 33K stock, that was a grant of 130K vesting over 4 years. And then with signing and annual bonus of ~20K, that person is in fact making 200K starting (although the median is probably a bit lower for a completely new employee).

On the other hand, people often forget about refreshes when looking at these things. And while a refresh grant won't be as large as the initial grant, they do make the overall comp significantly larger.


That is incorrect, the stock figure on levels.fyi is per year. It does average out over the grant though, ignoring uneven vesting schedules.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: